The persecution of John Lucas can not be allowed to continue.
I am reading the Thompson papers. It was like I was reading a comic fictional horror story until I got to the marginal note: “Lyle gets sick leaves at this point”. It was at this point that I realised how delusional the Thompson’s were and the great danger the children were in. It was also clear that Social Services hired the Thompson’s as a special foster home to place children who were victims of the new religious hysterical fuelled by the media, social workers, prosecutors, child therapists and cult cops.
In the summer of 1993 when John Lucas was given the tapes of the Dueck Kvello interview and the tapes of the children’s incredible story, I do not believe that it was the malicious prosecution that was a great concern. I also do not think that Mr Lucas had any choice in the matter. When his wife saw the tapes she saw what people who were traumatised after being maliciously prosecuted did not see. His wife saw the extreme danger the children were in, three children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders were in the control of a child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer who allowed themselves to be caught up in a delusional religious satanic child abuse hysteria. Mr Lucas’s wife saw the same as Justice Baynton’s judgement over ten years later but with a big difference. The three children, two twin girls 8 year’s old girls left to be raped by their brother by a child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer are not responsible for the damage done to innocent people charged. The child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer are responsible along with an administration of justice unable to admit that mistakes were made.
The administration of justice was fully aware at this time in the summer of 1993 that the rule of law broke down at the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry, trial and the Kvello/Klassen preliminary inquiry. Chief Justice MacPherson's Gag order of March 29, 1993 and charges against the other members of the Klassen family in February 1993 were either withdrawn or stayed to keep the public from seeing the truth.
When Mr Lucas informed the police, the local Saskatoon prosecutors, M.P., several senior persons within the Child Protective Service and a multitude of others that the twins were in danger and being raped there was never a better time for the truth to be told to the people of Saskatchewan.
Mr Lucas also contacted the SPCA at the same time about a dog being abused along with the children at the Thompson foster home. Not one of the people Mr Lucas contacted about the rape of 8 year old girls did anything to help them. They saw the tapes and other documents. When I read the following I had to stop reading the Thompson papers. One of the twin 8 year old girls answered a question with: “Kept taking me to the bushes forcedme to lay down and they screwed me.” “When they did it did you like it?” Was it just Mr Lucas and his wife that saw the danger the children were in and how sick and perverted that question was? The SPCA was at the Thompson foster home one and a half hours after Mr Lucas contacted them. There was more concern for the health and welfare of a dog being sexually abused then the rape of two 8 year old girls.
It is understandable that there would be a clash of personalities between Mr Lucas who was concerned for the children and the people maliciously prosecuted. As people were soon to find out, Mr Lucas, can be a royal pain in the ass. Not to say that the people maliciously prosecuted did not deserve to have their story told and their malicious prosecution exposed in the Fifth Estate “Scandal of the Century“, what about the children?
Mr Lucas had no way of knowing the extent of the cover-up or the number of prominent members of Saskatchewan’s elite establishment out to bury the truth. When Mr Lucas and his wife picketed it was to help the children, in doing this and the distribution of the tapes and documents they also exposed the administration of justice to disrepute in the eyes of the public. Had there been a few more caring women like Mr Lucas’s wife involved someone may have sat back and saw the danger the children were in besides the 5 others charged and quickly gagged. The publics image of the court and that stupid unwritten law in Canada that the court can never do any wrong or be placed into disrepute in the eyes of the public placed not only the court in disrepute, it placed the courts foundation and democracy at risk by gagging freedom of speech.
Mr Lucas had to be gagged, he was distributing tapes and documents that would expose the cover-up and without question this would have place the court into disrepute. Mr Lucas and his wife were arrested for defaming Dueck and gagged. By this time the cat was out of the bag, 5 more people picketed and were arrested for defaming Dueck and gagged. Had it not been for Mr Lucas and his wife’s concern for the children there would have not been an injusticebusters web site or Fifth Estate program. Had it not been for the different direction taken by the people maliciously prosecuted there would not have been a Baynton Judgement exposing the malicious prosecution. The fact that this was accomplished, not only by Mr Lucas and his wife but by all the people placed under extreme stress and in failing health for years is remarkable.
It had been two months without a written judgement from the time the Ross, Ross and White Appeal was heard in December of 1993. The appellant court was waiting for more convictions or other evidence to support the Ross, Ross and White appeal. In February, 1994, Richard Quinney, ordered all his prosecutors to send all of their files dealing with the Ross, Ross & White & Kvello/Klassen files to Mr. McKillop, (A Saskatchewan Justice employee) in Regina.
Mr Lucas had to be silenced along with the other 5 protesters. The transcripts and evidence from the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry and trial and the Kvello/Klassen preliminary inquiry had to be buried, for ever. The tapes and documents that Mr Lucas was distributing could not be used at the Ross, Ross and White appeal without placing the administration of justice and the NDP in a heap of trouble with the public. There was no way by this time to undo the cover-up or the damage done as a result. It was up to Justice Hrabinsky to silence Mr Lucas and his wife and bury the tapes and documents in a morass of gag orders, sealing documents and secret courts. I am shocked that a respected member of the judiciary as Justice Hrabinsky was then known would risk his reputation and place his court and everything the court stands for in a democratic country at risk.
It was clear to Mr. Justice Vancise in his descending written judgement that the written reasons for judgement on May 10, 1995 by 17 month Cameron upholding the Ross, Ross and White convictions would not pass the basic common sense test.
The cover-up was in full gear and Justice Hrabinsky would need help to bury the truth after the filing of claims for damages by the people wrongfully charged and convicted. The appointment of Madam Justice J A Smith and Justice Dovell on November 5, 1997 was not only a means of burying the truth, the NDP coalition church at work gang needed someone to do their lying for them. The gag orders, publication bans and secret courts and orders that followed were not to protect social workers, prosecutors, child therapists and a cult cop. The court could not give a fishes tit about them, or the children, they were out to bury the truth and keep a man with a grade seven education from having his case for damages heard by the court. A man with a grade seven education named Richard Klassen stood between the truth and a corrupt administration of justice.
The involvement of Justice Hrabinsky with Justice J A Smith and Dovell in protecting a lawyer who blackmailed a disabled man with a mental illness resulting in his being hospitalised in serious condition is despicable, not only has Justice Hrabinsky disgraced himself, he disgraced his court, his wife, and family. The retaliation by Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell against a disabled man who reported Nicolas Stooshinoff to the Saskatoon Police is a sign of the future direction and continued corruption of the Court of Queen’s Bench.
Mr Lucas’s criminal contempt of court charge was withdrawn. A friend of Justice Hrabinsky has removed himself as the trial judge after he told Mr Lucas that three of the other charges of defamatory libel were going to be stayed by the crown. Judges having information and evidence and a predetermined judgement before hearing the information or evidence in court is nothing new to Mr Lucas. When the appeal of the Lucas’s conviction was heard by the court of appeal on January 12, 1996 their lawyer was told by a justice of the court of appeal to “sit down, shut up, and do not say another word.”
John Lucas is not going to be silenced. Mr Lucas is a pain in the ass that the judges know will continue unless he is silenced. Justice Hrabinsky is not a senile paranoid old fool peaking out his windows looking for Mr Lucas out to harm him or his family. No matter what spin Hrabinsky puts in his judgements or his claims that he and his family are in danger of physical harm by Mr Lucas’s words, the hard facts are that no one is in physical danger by being embarrassed by the truth spoken by Mr Lucas.
If the other three charges of defamatory libel are withdrawn that will only leave Justice Hrabinsky. The crown has no way out unless it comes clean and admits the mistakes made in the past. This is not going to happen as was demonstrated by Richard Klassen having to drag them kicking and screaming to the truth for ten years. If it comes down to Lucas or Hrabinsky it is Mr Lucas who will be jailed by the court again. As Dueck has already been sacrificed by Saskatchewan Justice and has withdrawn his appeal of the Baynton Judgement, why not proceed with Dueck alone, and sacrifice Dueck again. I know a lot of people including two adult twin child victims who would testify on behalf of Mr Lucas if asked, nicely. All anyone needs to do to see the result of the crown proceeding with the Hrabinsky charge is to read the injusticebusters web site about withholding documents and the other well documented stomping on peoples Charter Rights over the past 12 years and counting.
It is over 18 months and counting since the Baynton appeal was filed. The out come of the appeal is as predicable as the Ross, Ross and White appeal. The Saskatchewan satanic child abuse nightmare and cover-up needs to come to an end. Call a public inquiry and restore some credibility to the administration of justice andto its silent judges and lawyers.
The appeal of the Baynton Judgement will continue to place the children of Saskatchewan at risk and in the control of social workers not accountable for their actions in a court of law. Social workers do not have the skills required to determine if a child is in need of protection. Return the decision to apprehend children in need of protection to a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench after a full investigation and hearing when the children are not in immediate danger. Return the power to anyone especially to a police officer to take charge of a child in need of help or protection without fear of reprisal if a mistake is made. What is wrong with admitting a mistake has been made when a child is mistakenly protected from danger. Start protecting the children by putting child abusers in jail, and do not let them out with the equipment needed to abuse a child.
The persecution of John Lucas can not be allowed to continue, the past is saturated in the tears of two twin 8 year old girls.
In the summer of 1993 when John Lucas was given the tapes of the Dueck Kvello interview and the tapes of the children’s incredible story, I do not believe that it was the malicious prosecution that was a great concern. I also do not think that Mr Lucas had any choice in the matter. When his wife saw the tapes she saw what people who were traumatised after being maliciously prosecuted did not see. His wife saw the extreme danger the children were in, three children with Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders were in the control of a child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer who allowed themselves to be caught up in a delusional religious satanic child abuse hysteria. Mr Lucas’s wife saw the same as Justice Baynton’s judgement over ten years later but with a big difference. The three children, two twin girls 8 year’s old girls left to be raped by their brother by a child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer are not responsible for the damage done to innocent people charged. The child therapist, a prosecutor and police officer are responsible along with an administration of justice unable to admit that mistakes were made.
The administration of justice was fully aware at this time in the summer of 1993 that the rule of law broke down at the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry, trial and the Kvello/Klassen preliminary inquiry. Chief Justice MacPherson's Gag order of March 29, 1993 and charges against the other members of the Klassen family in February 1993 were either withdrawn or stayed to keep the public from seeing the truth.
When Mr Lucas informed the police, the local Saskatoon prosecutors, M.P., several senior persons within the Child Protective Service and a multitude of others that the twins were in danger and being raped there was never a better time for the truth to be told to the people of Saskatchewan.
Mr Lucas also contacted the SPCA at the same time about a dog being abused along with the children at the Thompson foster home. Not one of the people Mr Lucas contacted about the rape of 8 year old girls did anything to help them. They saw the tapes and other documents. When I read the following I had to stop reading the Thompson papers. One of the twin 8 year old girls answered a question with: “Kept taking me to the bushes forcedme to lay down and they screwed me.” “When they did it did you like it?” Was it just Mr Lucas and his wife that saw the danger the children were in and how sick and perverted that question was? The SPCA was at the Thompson foster home one and a half hours after Mr Lucas contacted them. There was more concern for the health and welfare of a dog being sexually abused then the rape of two 8 year old girls.
It is understandable that there would be a clash of personalities between Mr Lucas who was concerned for the children and the people maliciously prosecuted. As people were soon to find out, Mr Lucas, can be a royal pain in the ass. Not to say that the people maliciously prosecuted did not deserve to have their story told and their malicious prosecution exposed in the Fifth Estate “Scandal of the Century“, what about the children?
Mr Lucas had no way of knowing the extent of the cover-up or the number of prominent members of Saskatchewan’s elite establishment out to bury the truth. When Mr Lucas and his wife picketed it was to help the children, in doing this and the distribution of the tapes and documents they also exposed the administration of justice to disrepute in the eyes of the public. Had there been a few more caring women like Mr Lucas’s wife involved someone may have sat back and saw the danger the children were in besides the 5 others charged and quickly gagged. The publics image of the court and that stupid unwritten law in Canada that the court can never do any wrong or be placed into disrepute in the eyes of the public placed not only the court in disrepute, it placed the courts foundation and democracy at risk by gagging freedom of speech.
Mr Lucas had to be gagged, he was distributing tapes and documents that would expose the cover-up and without question this would have place the court into disrepute. Mr Lucas and his wife were arrested for defaming Dueck and gagged. By this time the cat was out of the bag, 5 more people picketed and were arrested for defaming Dueck and gagged. Had it not been for Mr Lucas and his wife’s concern for the children there would have not been an injusticebusters web site or Fifth Estate program. Had it not been for the different direction taken by the people maliciously prosecuted there would not have been a Baynton Judgement exposing the malicious prosecution. The fact that this was accomplished, not only by Mr Lucas and his wife but by all the people placed under extreme stress and in failing health for years is remarkable.
It had been two months without a written judgement from the time the Ross, Ross and White Appeal was heard in December of 1993. The appellant court was waiting for more convictions or other evidence to support the Ross, Ross and White appeal. In February, 1994, Richard Quinney, ordered all his prosecutors to send all of their files dealing with the Ross, Ross & White & Kvello/Klassen files to Mr. McKillop, (A Saskatchewan Justice employee) in Regina.
Mr Lucas had to be silenced along with the other 5 protesters. The transcripts and evidence from the Ross, Ross and White preliminary inquiry and trial and the Kvello/Klassen preliminary inquiry had to be buried, for ever. The tapes and documents that Mr Lucas was distributing could not be used at the Ross, Ross and White appeal without placing the administration of justice and the NDP in a heap of trouble with the public. There was no way by this time to undo the cover-up or the damage done as a result. It was up to Justice Hrabinsky to silence Mr Lucas and his wife and bury the tapes and documents in a morass of gag orders, sealing documents and secret courts. I am shocked that a respected member of the judiciary as Justice Hrabinsky was then known would risk his reputation and place his court and everything the court stands for in a democratic country at risk.
It was clear to Mr. Justice Vancise in his descending written judgement that the written reasons for judgement on May 10, 1995 by 17 month Cameron upholding the Ross, Ross and White convictions would not pass the basic common sense test.
The cover-up was in full gear and Justice Hrabinsky would need help to bury the truth after the filing of claims for damages by the people wrongfully charged and convicted. The appointment of Madam Justice J A Smith and Justice Dovell on November 5, 1997 was not only a means of burying the truth, the NDP coalition church at work gang needed someone to do their lying for them. The gag orders, publication bans and secret courts and orders that followed were not to protect social workers, prosecutors, child therapists and a cult cop. The court could not give a fishes tit about them, or the children, they were out to bury the truth and keep a man with a grade seven education from having his case for damages heard by the court. A man with a grade seven education named Richard Klassen stood between the truth and a corrupt administration of justice.
The involvement of Justice Hrabinsky with Justice J A Smith and Dovell in protecting a lawyer who blackmailed a disabled man with a mental illness resulting in his being hospitalised in serious condition is despicable, not only has Justice Hrabinsky disgraced himself, he disgraced his court, his wife, and family. The retaliation by Justice Hrabinsky and Dovell against a disabled man who reported Nicolas Stooshinoff to the Saskatoon Police is a sign of the future direction and continued corruption of the Court of Queen’s Bench.
Mr Lucas’s criminal contempt of court charge was withdrawn. A friend of Justice Hrabinsky has removed himself as the trial judge after he told Mr Lucas that three of the other charges of defamatory libel were going to be stayed by the crown. Judges having information and evidence and a predetermined judgement before hearing the information or evidence in court is nothing new to Mr Lucas. When the appeal of the Lucas’s conviction was heard by the court of appeal on January 12, 1996 their lawyer was told by a justice of the court of appeal to “sit down, shut up, and do not say another word.”
John Lucas is not going to be silenced. Mr Lucas is a pain in the ass that the judges know will continue unless he is silenced. Justice Hrabinsky is not a senile paranoid old fool peaking out his windows looking for Mr Lucas out to harm him or his family. No matter what spin Hrabinsky puts in his judgements or his claims that he and his family are in danger of physical harm by Mr Lucas’s words, the hard facts are that no one is in physical danger by being embarrassed by the truth spoken by Mr Lucas.
If the other three charges of defamatory libel are withdrawn that will only leave Justice Hrabinsky. The crown has no way out unless it comes clean and admits the mistakes made in the past. This is not going to happen as was demonstrated by Richard Klassen having to drag them kicking and screaming to the truth for ten years. If it comes down to Lucas or Hrabinsky it is Mr Lucas who will be jailed by the court again. As Dueck has already been sacrificed by Saskatchewan Justice and has withdrawn his appeal of the Baynton Judgement, why not proceed with Dueck alone, and sacrifice Dueck again. I know a lot of people including two adult twin child victims who would testify on behalf of Mr Lucas if asked, nicely. All anyone needs to do to see the result of the crown proceeding with the Hrabinsky charge is to read the injusticebusters web site about withholding documents and the other well documented stomping on peoples Charter Rights over the past 12 years and counting.
It is over 18 months and counting since the Baynton appeal was filed. The out come of the appeal is as predicable as the Ross, Ross and White appeal. The Saskatchewan satanic child abuse nightmare and cover-up needs to come to an end. Call a public inquiry and restore some credibility to the administration of justice andto its silent judges and lawyers.
The appeal of the Baynton Judgement will continue to place the children of Saskatchewan at risk and in the control of social workers not accountable for their actions in a court of law. Social workers do not have the skills required to determine if a child is in need of protection. Return the decision to apprehend children in need of protection to a justice of the Court of Queen’s Bench after a full investigation and hearing when the children are not in immediate danger. Return the power to anyone especially to a police officer to take charge of a child in need of help or protection without fear of reprisal if a mistake is made. What is wrong with admitting a mistake has been made when a child is mistakenly protected from danger. Start protecting the children by putting child abusers in jail, and do not let them out with the equipment needed to abuse a child.
The persecution of John Lucas can not be allowed to continue, the past is saturated in the tears of two twin 8 year old girls.
posted by James Hunter at 12:50 AM
![[EFC Blue Ribbon - Free Speech Online]](http://www.efc.ca/images/efcfreet.gif)
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home