The R v Lucas Charges 2003.

1. Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did
COMMIT A CONTEMPT OF COURT BY CAUSING POSTERS TO BE DISPLAYED WHICH WERE CONTEMPTUOUS OF JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY, A JUDGE OF THE COURT OF QUEEN'S BENCH FOR SASKATCHEWAN CONTRARY TO LAW.

2. Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did
PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT JUSTICE PAUL HRABINSKY KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE, CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

3. Between the 8th day of September, A.D. 2003 and the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN, did
PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN DUECK, A PEACE OFFICE BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT SUPERINTENDENT BRIAN DUECK KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE, CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.

4. On or about the 15th day of September, A.D. 2003 at or near SASKATOON, SASKATCHEWAN did
PUBLISH MATTER WITHOUT LAWFUL JUSTIFICATION OR EXCUSE THAT WAS LIKELY TO INJURE THE REPUTATION OF ROD DONLEVY BY EXPOSING HIM TO HATRED, CONTEMPT OR RIDICULE, OR THAT WAS DESIGNED TO INSULT ROD DONLEVY KNOWING THAT THE MATTER WAS FALSE AND DID THEREBY COMMIT AN OFFENCE CONTRARY TO SECTION 300 OF THE CRIMINAL CODE.