Sunday, May 08, 2005

A short example of Judicial Protection

Saskatoon lawyer Nicolas Stooshinoff was caught red handed blackmailing a Saskatoon homeowner. The homeowners first Motions were heard by judges who had a very serious concern about the affidavit evidence of the homeowner. Three days notice is needed for a chambers application to give the chambers judge time to read the affidavits and understand the issues. Ample notice was given as the cases are usually heard in the order they are received leaving the last motion filed being heard some times well after lunch. The homeowners motion and affidavit detailing the blackmail scam was number 11 on the list. It was clear that Madam Justice G A Smith had not read the filed information of the cases. When number 7 on the list was heard, Madam Justice G A Smith told Mr Kennedy that she had not read the submissions and both lawyers clearly upset then went into a lengthy verbal submission. Madam Justice Smith left the homeowner’s hearing until last. She knew every detail about the homeowners case and nothing about any of the case’s filed before the homeowners. With an empty court room she proceeded with a injustice that resulted in the homeowner being rushed to the hospital in serious condition. The Saskatoon police then investigated and recommended that criminal charges be proceeded with. The homeowners attempts to have a lawyer represent them resulted in referrals to Brent Gough, president of the Saskatchewan Law Society. All the lawyers the homeowners contacted had no choice but to refer the homeowners to Mr Gough. Mr Gough did nothing, the prosecutors office did nothing. The homeowners were just added to the bottom of the long and growing list of Saskatoon injustice stories. I say Saskatoon and not Saskatchewan because the province does not as a whole have a documented culture of injustice, racism and moral anarchy like Saskatoon has festered in from the days of the Milgaard trial.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home